2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2012.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of dual-hop fixed-gain AF relaying systems with OSTBC over Nakagami-m fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following [16, 18], the squaring approach method is considered to decode OSTBCs at the destination. Accordingly, the average signal power for a symbol sk (1kK) and noise power at the destination can be written, respectively, as Pt=α4bold-italichSRF22bold-italichRDF22E][|sk|2 right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptPw=α2bold-italichSRF2bold-italichRDF2×α2|hfalse~RR|2bold-italichRDF2E|sfalse~R[nτ]|2+α2bold-italichRDF2σ2+σ2where h~RRhRR,l,1ems~Rfalse[nτfalse]αyR,l,E][|s1|2=E][|s2...…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following [16, 18], the squaring approach method is considered to decode OSTBCs at the destination. Accordingly, the average signal power for a symbol sk (1kK) and noise power at the destination can be written, respectively, as Pt=α4bold-italichSRF22bold-italichRDF22E][|sk|2 right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptPw=α2bold-italichSRF2bold-italichRDF2×α2|hfalse~RR|2bold-italichRDF2E|sfalse~R[nτ]|2+α2bold-italichRDF2σ2+σ2where h~RRhRR,l,1ems~Rfalse[nτfalse]αyR,l,E][|s1|2=E][|s2...…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] for more than two transmit antennas. Most of the works in the literature investigate OSTBC transmission in MIMO HD relay networks [15–18], but to the best of our knowledge, studies on MIMO FD relaying are quite limited, see e.g. [19–24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total transmit power is equally allocated to all active transmit antennas that yields the factor 1Li in and . Under the assumption that the channel estimation processes are perfectly carried out at each hop, and the fixed relaying gain α=trueγ̄1+trueγ̄[, ] is used, the instantaneous end‐to‐end SNR at the destination receiver output can be derived as [, ] γFGAF(o1,o2)=γS,1(o1)γS,2(o2)γS,2()o2+1+trueγ̄ for dual‐hop FGAF relaying schemes with TAS/OSTBC schemes in both hops. In , (oi)=(oC,i,1,oC,i,2,,oC,i,Li),i=1,2, and ( o i ) = ( o M , i ), i = 1,2, for conventional and modified schemes, and the label S becomes C or M similarly.…”
Section: System Model and Snr Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]- [5] numaralı çalışmaların sonuçlarına göre, klasik (yaygın) TAS/OSTBC (C-TAS/OSTBC) yapısında kullanılan optimum anten seçimi stratejisi daha yüksek geribesleme yüküne neden olmaktadır ki, bu da, geribesleme kanalı trafigini artırmakla kalmayıp, geribesleme hatalarının varlıgında söz konusu sistemlerin ortalama kesinti ve hata olasılıgı performansında düşüşlere neden olmaktadır. Bunun yanında, OS-TBC yapısı, işbirlikli ve atlamalı haberleşme sistemlerinde, çeşitleme kazancı elde etmek amacıyla her bir dügüm arasındaki işaretleşme için kullanılabilmektedir [8]- [17].İki atlamalı kuvvetlendir-ve-aktar (amplify-and-forward (AF)) ve çöz-ve-978-1-4799-4874-1/14/$31.00 c 2014 IEEE aktar (decode-and-forward (DF)) tipi röleli yapılara ilişkin performans analizleri literatürde çogunlukla anten seçimsiz (saf) OSTBC tekniginin ortalama kesinti ve hata olasılıgı ile ilgilenmiştir. Ayrıca, röleli haberleşme sistemlerinin antenler arası ilişki [14], zaman-senkronizasyon hataları [15], anahtar deligi (keyhole) etkisi [16] ve FE [6] gibi pratik uyumsuzluklar durumundaki performansını ele alan birkaç çalışma da bulunmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified