2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cdt.2018.5045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of dynamic CMOS circuit based on node‐discharger and twist‐connected transistors

Abstract: The incessant growth of devices such as mobile phones, digital cameras, and other portable electronic gadgets has led to a higher amount of research being dedicated to the low power digital and analogue circuits. In this study, a low powerdelay-product (PDP) dynamic complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) circuit design using small swing domino logic with twist-connected transistors is proposed. An improvement in PDP can be achieved by using a node-discharger circuit in the conventional design. The conv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since both the precharging time and the average power consumption are dependent on the input pattern, half of the input bits is assumed to be at logic “1” and the other half is assumed to be at logic “0.” Although both the power consumption and the PDP of the scheme of Angeline and Bhaaskaran 47 are smaller than those of the proposed scheme, it must be noted that the load capacitance of this scheme is just the parasitic capacitance at the gate terminal of the keeper. Other schemes for comparison can be found in other studies 48–55 …”
Section: Simulation Results Discussion and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both the precharging time and the average power consumption are dependent on the input pattern, half of the input bits is assumed to be at logic “1” and the other half is assumed to be at logic “0.” Although both the power consumption and the PDP of the scheme of Angeline and Bhaaskaran 47 are smaller than those of the proposed scheme, it must be noted that the load capacitance of this scheme is just the parasitic capacitance at the gate terminal of the keeper. Other schemes for comparison can be found in other studies 48–55 …”
Section: Simulation Results Discussion and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%