IECON 2022 – 48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iecon49645.2022.9968908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of KVM Hypervisor Using a Self-Driving Developer Kit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also analyze how KVM is more easily portable than Xen and how Docker, although fast and easy to deploy, is a less secure alternative to hypervisors, because hypervisors use hardware extensions to offer greater isolation (VMs do not share kernel space, while containers do). However, in a recent paper Müller et al measured the overhead of KVM on a self-driving caroriented Nvidia Drive AGX SoC and concluded that KVM produces too high an overhead in this particular case, which makes it unusable in real-world use cases [73].…”
Section: Kvmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also analyze how KVM is more easily portable than Xen and how Docker, although fast and easy to deploy, is a less secure alternative to hypervisors, because hypervisors use hardware extensions to offer greater isolation (VMs do not share kernel space, while containers do). However, in a recent paper Müller et al measured the overhead of KVM on a self-driving caroriented Nvidia Drive AGX SoC and concluded that KVM produces too high an overhead in this particular case, which makes it unusable in real-world use cases [73].…”
Section: Kvmmentioning
confidence: 99%