2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22726-4_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Video Protocols over IP Transition Mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unsurprisingly they determine that throughput is slightly increased due to the additional header and agree that native IPv6 has lower end-to-end delay than IPv4. Sathu and Shah also compared dual stack and found it only had a slight increase in throughput over IPv6 [7]. Where both IPv4 and IPv6 are operational on each host the additional overhead from effectively duplicating the implementations also identified by Wu et al as a potential shortfall, will always create a marginal increase [1].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unsurprisingly they determine that throughput is slightly increased due to the additional header and agree that native IPv6 has lower end-to-end delay than IPv4. Sathu and Shah also compared dual stack and found it only had a slight increase in throughput over IPv6 [7]. Where both IPv4 and IPv6 are operational on each host the additional overhead from effectively duplicating the implementations also identified by Wu et al as a potential shortfall, will always create a marginal increase [1].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the tunneling mechanisms themselves Sathu and Shah concluded that 6-to-4 tunneling was slightly better than 6-in-4 [7]. However the variation is quite small indicating neither is necessarily better than the other.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation