2011
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2011.2112070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of ZF and MMSE Equalizers for MIMO Systems: An In-Depth Study of the High SNR Regime

Abstract: This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the zero forcing (ZF) and minimum mean squared error (MMSE) equalizers applied to wireless multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems with no fewer receive than transmit antennas. In spite of much prior work on this subject, we reveal several new and surprising analytical results in terms of the well-known performance metrics of output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), uncoded error and outage probabilities, diversity-multiplexing (D-M) gain tradeoff, and coding gain. Con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
258
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
258
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there are only m(m + 1)/2 − 1 possible orderings required, which represent a remarkable computational gain over the clear-optimal ordering, especially for high m values, e.g., when m ≥ 4. Moreover, it has been shown that there is no performance degradation between the suboptimal and optimal ordering with respect to diversity gain, but only a slight penalty on the coding gain [32]. To this end, we elaborate on two suboptimal ordering approaches, which are based on the channel gains and are established prior to the initial first SIC stage.…”
Section: A V-blast Decoding At the Relaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there are only m(m + 1)/2 − 1 possible orderings required, which represent a remarkable computational gain over the clear-optimal ordering, especially for high m values, e.g., when m ≥ 4. Moreover, it has been shown that there is no performance degradation between the suboptimal and optimal ordering with respect to diversity gain, but only a slight penalty on the coding gain [32]. To this end, we elaborate on two suboptimal ordering approaches, which are based on the channel gains and are established prior to the initial first SIC stage.…”
Section: A V-blast Decoding At the Relaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can estimate the detector's performance at the k-th subcarrier by evaluating its BEP. According to [27], the maximum output Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of the…”
Section: A Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which can be computed from (27)(28). The meanĥ r,t (n) and covariance matrixΞ r (t,t ′ ) (n) can be obtained from P (h(n)).…”
Section: B Estimation Of Noise Covariance Matrix Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum likelihood detectors (MLD) [3][4][5] which are the performanceoptimal detectors suffer from exponential complexity in terms of the number of the transmitted signal, and they are not practical when the number of the transmitted signal becomes large. The linear detectors (LD) [6], including the zero forcing (ZF) and the minimum mean square error *Correspondence: liuch@njupt.edu.cn School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 210003 Nanjing, China (MMSE) LDs, can provide polynomial complexity. However, the bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the LDs is far inferior to the MLD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%