2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and composition analysis of engineered cementitious composite (ECC) – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An ECC also shows high resilience to cracks, good ductility, and the ability to control crack depth, rendering it the ideal composite to improve the durability of civil infrastructures [ 5 ]. This is because ECCs are able to form steady and multiple microcracks that considerably improve its durability in the aspects of tensile strength and ductility compared to other forms of concrete [ 6 ]. An ECC has an efficiency of around 3–5% (1.03–1.05 times) more than the strength of conventional concrete, with respect to high tensile strength [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ECC also shows high resilience to cracks, good ductility, and the ability to control crack depth, rendering it the ideal composite to improve the durability of civil infrastructures [ 5 ]. This is because ECCs are able to form steady and multiple microcracks that considerably improve its durability in the aspects of tensile strength and ductility compared to other forms of concrete [ 6 ]. An ECC has an efficiency of around 3–5% (1.03–1.05 times) more than the strength of conventional concrete, with respect to high tensile strength [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of fibers have been used in ECC, such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers. These fibers have been shown to effectively improve the mechanical properties of the ECC [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Nevertheless, among all the currently used fibers, PE fibers are expensive and do not adhere sufficiently to the cementitious matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECC provides an increment in tensile strain capacity by around 3–8% [ 7 ]. However, the high tensile strain in ECC also brings higher possibility of sudden failure as the damage tolerance is reduced as the tensile strain increases [ 8 ]. Moreover, ECC also has its drawbacks including lower compressive strength (40.8 MPa) compared to conventional concrete (49.7 MPa).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ECC also has its drawbacks including lower compressive strength (40.8 MPa) compared to conventional concrete (49.7 MPa). It was also shown that, following the addition of high-volume fly ash (HVFA), there is an increase in fire resistance, fiber/matrix chemical bond interface, matrix toughness, drying shrinkage, tensile strain capacity, multiple cracking, and crack width, but it attains a decrease in compressive, flexural, and tensile strength [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%