2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijvd.2009.024242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and emissions of motorcycle engines using water-fuel emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three main water injection methods: intake port water injection, direct water injection in the cylinder, and fuel-water emulsion. Although the fuel-water emulsion can be directly injected into the cylinder by the fuel injection system, the fuel-water emulsion has some disadvantages: the emulsification process is complicated, the emulsifier is expensive, and the ratio of water to fuel is fixed and cannot be adjusted according to the working conditions. The advantage of direct water injection in the cylinder is that the water injection volume and water injection time can be flexibly adjusted. The disadvantage is that it is more complicated to add a separate water injection system to the cylinder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main water injection methods: intake port water injection, direct water injection in the cylinder, and fuel-water emulsion. Although the fuel-water emulsion can be directly injected into the cylinder by the fuel injection system, the fuel-water emulsion has some disadvantages: the emulsification process is complicated, the emulsifier is expensive, and the ratio of water to fuel is fixed and cannot be adjusted according to the working conditions. The advantage of direct water injection in the cylinder is that the water injection volume and water injection time can be flexibly adjusted. The disadvantage is that it is more complicated to add a separate water injection system to the cylinder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuel-water emulsification method first prepares a stable suspension of gasoline, emulsion, and water, and then the injection system injects the emulsion into the cylinder. However, the emulsification method has the following disadvantages: the emulsification process is very complicated, the stability of the emulsified fuel also requires a lot of work, the price of the emulsifier is expensive, the ratio of water to fuel is fixed, and the quantity of water cannot be adjusted according to the working conditions of the gasoline engine [25][26][27]. The advantage of water injection in the intake port is that there is basically no need to change the structure of the gasoline engine, and the water quantity can be adjusted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a spark ignition (SI) engine, a three-way catalytic converter efficiently reduces HC, CO, and NO x , although the mixture must be maintained within a narrow air-fuel-ratio window. Other technologies for reducing NO x include exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) [5], selective catalytic reduction (SCR) [6], a NO x trap [7], a plasma reactor [8], water injection [9], water/fuel emulsions [10], and homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) [11][12][13]. SCR and lean NO x -trap have been applied in diesel vehicles to meet standard emission limits [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%