2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and mechanism of nitric oxide removal using a thermophilic membrane biofilm reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, nitric oxide (NO) is deemed a culprit in air pollution, and it is important to lower its levels in cities. However, traditional purification techniques such as biofiltration, physical adsorption, and heterogeneous catalytic reduction and oxidation are not suitable for parts per billion (ppb)‐level NO treatment. Semiconductor photocatalysis technology using solar energy is the most effective method for NO removal at ppb level .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, nitric oxide (NO) is deemed a culprit in air pollution, and it is important to lower its levels in cities. However, traditional purification techniques such as biofiltration, physical adsorption, and heterogeneous catalytic reduction and oxidation are not suitable for parts per billion (ppb)‐level NO treatment. Semiconductor photocatalysis technology using solar energy is the most effective method for NO removal at ppb level .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under anaerobic conditions the NO RE was as high as 99%, in contrast to the 55% obtained using an O 2 concentration of 6%. Similarly, negative effects were observed in another study (Niu et al, 2014) Wei et al (2016a) noted that, in some MBRs combining nitrification and aerobic denitrification, the effect of O 2 is not a critical operational parameter.…”
Section: Denitrification Processmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Recently, the most widely used configuration in NO denitrification has been membrane bioreactors (MBRs), which provide a large gasliquid surface to improve mass transfer characteristics (Zhang et al, 2013). The most studied MBR configurations include thermophilic reactors (Razaviarani et al, 2019;Wei et al, 2016a) and catalytic membrane reactors (CMRs) (Wei et al, 2016b(Wei et al, , 2019.…”
Section: Denitrification Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the biological flue gas desulfurization and denitrification technology has been gradually developed. Compared with the traditional process, the biological removal of SO 2 and NO x from flue gas has the advantages of low energy consumption and operation cost, convenient operation, less secondary pollution and higher removal efficiency [3,4]. It mainly includes biological flue gas desulfurization technology (Bio-FGD) and the integrated physicochemical and biological technique for NO x removal from flue gas (BioDeNOx, or chemical absorption biological reduction (CABR)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%