“…Moreover, inerter-vibration absorbers have two unique properties, which are more attractive than TMDs: first, the inertance mass ratio of inerter-based TMDs can easily be larger than the mass ratio of TMDs without increasing the gravitational mass of the whole system (De Domenico and Ricciardi, 2018a, 2018b; Marian and Giaralis, 2014; Pietrosanti et al, 2017); second, there is no need to mount an additional mass on the object to be controlled (Hu et al, 2015). The inerter-based devices have been also investigated for mitigation of the liquid sloshing in storage tanks (Luo et al, 2016), to enhance the properties of TMDs (De Domenico and Ricciardi, 2018a; De Domenico et al, 2019), for seismic protection of building structure (Radu et al, 2019), for seismic protection of wind turbine towers (Zhang et al, 2019), for improving the seismic performance of base-isolated structure (De Domenico and Ricciardi, 2018b, 2018c; Saitoh, 2012), for vibration suppression of cables (Lazar et al, 2016), for wind-induced vibration mitigation of tall buildings using TMDI (Giaralis and Petrini, 2017), and for vehicle suppression (Chen et al, 2009, 2016; Hu et al, 2014; Smith and Wang, 2004; Wang and Chan, 2001; Wang et al, 2012) and vibration suppression (Brzeski et al, 2015; Lazar et al, 2014). The interest in passive network synthesis has also been rekindled (Chen, 2008; Chen and Smith, 2009a, 2009b; Chen et al, 2013; Wang and Chen, 2012).…”