2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance benchmarking of state-of-the-art software switches for NFV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BESS is a representative NFV device such that it has been widely used by advanced NFV techniques, such as NFP [7]. The reason we chose BESS is that it has high performance in more SFC scenarios [33]. Our experiments are conducted on a testbed comprising three servers, each of which has twelve 2.3 GHz CPU cores, 128 GB RAM, and a two‐port 40 Gbps NIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BESS is a representative NFV device such that it has been widely used by advanced NFV techniques, such as NFP [7]. The reason we chose BESS is that it has high performance in more SFC scenarios [33]. Our experiments are conducted on a testbed comprising three servers, each of which has twelve 2.3 GHz CPU cores, 128 GB RAM, and a two‐port 40 Gbps NIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a research direction can be analyzing the application requirement and devices capabilities to provide directions on an appropriate selection of the network element for a particular application. Starting points can be the studies in [13], [177]. While [177] explores the design spaces of seven state-of-the-art software switches and compares their performance under specific application of routing NFV traffic, [13] have a more general view.…”
Section: E Generic Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting points can be the studies in [13], [177]. While [177] explores the design spaces of seven state-of-the-art software switches and compares their performance under specific application of routing NFV traffic, [13] have a more general view. Indeed, [13] gives some guidelines to implement several applications based on a few application features i.e., number of operations per packet, required storage per packet processing, and output size after packet processing.…”
Section: E Generic Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network functions virtualization (NFV) [1] addresses this issue by transforming network functions into virtualized network functions (VNF) [2] and deploying them on general‐purpose hardware platforms [3, 4]. NFV provides customized network services via service function chain (SFC) [5], introduces a new network function service business processing architecture, and enhances service flexibility and scalability [6]. SFC in NFV chains service requests to process network services by directing traffic to corresponding network functional nodes for processing through sequence‐ordered VNFs in a user‐issued SFC request (SFCR) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%