2019 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icsipa45851.2019.8977732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison Between SURF and SIFT for Content-Based Image Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason SIFT gives better and more reliable matching than those obtained from its predecessor descriptors lies in the cascade filtering approach that is used to detect the features which in return transforms the image data into scale-invariant coordinates relative to the local features. Lowe formulated SIFT algorithm into four major computational stages: a)Scale-Space Extrema Detection b)Keypoint Localization c)Orientation Assignment d)Keypoint Descriptor [55].…”
Section: Scale Invariant Feature Transform (Sift)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason SIFT gives better and more reliable matching than those obtained from its predecessor descriptors lies in the cascade filtering approach that is used to detect the features which in return transforms the image data into scale-invariant coordinates relative to the local features. Lowe formulated SIFT algorithm into four major computational stages: a)Scale-Space Extrema Detection b)Keypoint Localization c)Orientation Assignment d)Keypoint Descriptor [55].…”
Section: Scale Invariant Feature Transform (Sift)mentioning
confidence: 99%