2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/peoco.2013.6564513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of 24S-10P and 24S-14P field excitation flux switching machine with single DC-Coil polarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is to reduce the PM cost due to the increasing price of PM since 2011, (iii) Generally, it is expected that the longer the PM depth will produce more flux and enhance the overall performances, therefore in this design the PM depth is set approximately one third of the stator depth. However, demagnetization effect on the PM edge needs to be taken into consideration when higher PM depth is applied, (iv) The slot area of DC FEC is set to 197.01 mm 2 to give a maximum current density, Je of 30 A/mm 2 with 44 turns of FEC winding. The FEC slot depth is less than the PM depth to give an appropriate distance between the adjacent FEC slots area for the flux to flow in this area, (v) The depth of armature slot area is set similar to the PM depth in order to avoid overlapping between armature coil winding and FEC winding.…”
Section: Design Methodology Of the Proposed Outer-rotor Hefsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason is to reduce the PM cost due to the increasing price of PM since 2011, (iii) Generally, it is expected that the longer the PM depth will produce more flux and enhance the overall performances, therefore in this design the PM depth is set approximately one third of the stator depth. However, demagnetization effect on the PM edge needs to be taken into consideration when higher PM depth is applied, (iv) The slot area of DC FEC is set to 197.01 mm 2 to give a maximum current density, Je of 30 A/mm 2 with 44 turns of FEC winding. The FEC slot depth is less than the PM depth to give an appropriate distance between the adjacent FEC slots area for the flux to flow in this area, (v) The depth of armature slot area is set similar to the PM depth in order to avoid overlapping between armature coil winding and FEC winding.…”
Section: Design Methodology Of the Proposed Outer-rotor Hefsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation is implemented on three conditions of FEC current density, J e which are set at 10 A/mm 2 , 20 A/mm 2 , and 30 A/mm 2 . The armature coil current density is kept constant at maximum of 30 A rms /mm 2 .…”
Section: B Flux Path and Flux Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FSM can be classified into three bunches that are Permanent magnet (PM) FSM, Field Excitation (FE) FSM and Hybrid Excitation (HE) FSM. Permanent magnet and field winding are the fundamental sources of flux in PMFSM and FEFSM, respectively while in HEFSM, both field winding and permanent magnet produces the flux [1]- [4]. In all these FSMs the armature winding and field winding or Permanent magnets are found on the stator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total flux generation is limited because of adjacent DC field excitation coil isolation, as marked by red circles and thus machine performance is affected. To overcome the drawbacks, a new structure of 24S-10P and 24S-14P WFSalR SFM with single DC polarity have been introduced and compared as depicted in Figure 2 [8]. Although less leakage flux and uncomplicated manufacturing of single DC FEC are the advantages of proposed machine, but it has overlapping armature and field windings which increases the cost, copper losses and thus reduce the efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%