2013 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icos.2013.6735045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization towards benchmark functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations (34)- (37) represent the control signals necessary for path tracking. On the other hand, Equations (38) and (39) are used to determine the warping and pitch angles necessary for tracking the reference. The only value that remains unknown is α, so tuning of the controller is required.…”
Section: Backstepping Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equations (34)- (37) represent the control signals necessary for path tracking. On the other hand, Equations (38) and (39) are used to determine the warping and pitch angles necessary for tracking the reference. The only value that remains unknown is α, so tuning of the controller is required.…”
Section: Backstepping Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UAV systems have been studied as a whole or in subsystems (for example, tilt control). The challenge of these vehicles is that they are nonlinear, subacted, and multivariable systems, subject to unpredictable disturbances such as the interaction of the rotor flow with the quadrotor chassis or atmospheric turbulence [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], so that classic control (linear and invariant over time) has limited results where instabilities can occur when the system moves away from equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These optimization algorithms have different characteristics, but GA has been proven to have a better performance in many cases. Goyal et al [25] did a performance comparative analysis by using ACO, GA and PSO respectively in solving the Travelling salesman problem, which showed that GA is a better approach than other algorithms Lim et al [26] compared the performance of GA, DE and PSO by using the same parameters setting for same optimization problems, where GA was proven to have a better performance than DE and PSO. Furthermore, GA has also been widely used in solving task scheduling problems in distributed systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviors present in bee colonies are also taken into account to solve problems of research and exploration [12] Other optimization algorithms with this focus have been inspired by swarms of animals such as birds and fish, spawning optimization based on particle swarm. Meanwhile, genetic algorithms and differential evolution attempt to emulate nature's process in improving a species over time [13].…”
Section: Bio-inspired Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%