2018
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of machine learning techniques in sleep scoring based on wavelet features and neighboring component analysis

Abstract: IntroductionSleep scoring is an important step in the treatment of sleep disorders. Manual annotation of sleep stages is time-consuming and experience-relevant and, therefore, needs to be done using machine learning techniques.MethodsSleep-EDF polysomnography was used in this study as a dataset. Support vector machines and artificial neural network performance were compared in sleep scoring using wavelet tree features and neighborhood component analysis.ResultsNeighboring component analysis as a combination of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radha et al [47] considered multiple EEG signals and extracted features from different domains like time and frequency. The author in this work used SVM and Random Forests (RF) were considered for the classification of different sleep stages.…”
Section: Sn Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radha et al [47] considered multiple EEG signals and extracted features from different domains like time and frequency. The author in this work used SVM and Random Forests (RF) were considered for the classification of different sleep stages.…”
Section: Sn Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs and SVM can integrate and enhance WA, whereas WA-based state-of-art methods can be effectively utilized in feature generation and dimension reduction together with next-generation tools, such as the neighboring component analysis (NCA) and other techniques combining both linear and non-linear feature selection methods. ANNs and SVM can achieve accuracy up to 90.30% and 89.93%, respectively, in properly classifying EEG patterns and sleep scoring [40].…”
Section: Sleep and Signaling-based Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study conducted with the sleep-EDF dataset, Savarek et.al. utilized from wavelet tree, neighboring component analysis (NCA), SVM, and ANN [23] to reach a classification accuracy of 90% and 89% for the ANN and SVM respectively. Wei et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%