2018
DOI: 10.1109/tbc.2017.2711145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of R-PHY and R-MACPHY Modular Cable Access Network Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [176], the remote PHY (R-PHY) and the remote PHY-MAC (R-PHYMAC) based modular broadcast cable network is proposed for the access network. In this architecture, R-PHYMAC can achieve lower mean upstream packet delay compared to R-PHY for bursty traffic and long distance over 100 miles.…”
Section: J Cran and Other Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [176], the remote PHY (R-PHY) and the remote PHY-MAC (R-PHYMAC) based modular broadcast cable network is proposed for the access network. In this architecture, R-PHYMAC can achieve lower mean upstream packet delay compared to R-PHY for bursty traffic and long distance over 100 miles.…”
Section: J Cran and Other Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, means of reducing the fronthaul bitrate requirements and supporting statistical multiplexing through the caching of repetitive quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) symbols in the R-FFT node were proposed. The Remote PHY (R-PHY) and Remote MACPHY (R-MACPHY) modular cable access network architectures were compared in [30]. In the former architecture, the PHY layer processing is implemented in the remote node (RN) that is close to the cable modems (CMs), and for the upstream transmissions, the medium access control (MAC) layer processing is handled in the headend, while for the latter architecture, both PHY and MAC layers are processed in the RN.…”
Section: Transport Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadcast cable access networks have been extensively studied for providing wired broadband Internet access to residential users [13]- [22]. Recent studies have examined the impact of the distance between the remote node and cable headend on the medium access control (MAC) performance of the R-PHY modular architecture (which conducts all physical layer processing in the remote node and the MAC in the headend) and the R-MACPHY architecture (which conducts all physical layer processing plus the MAC in the remote node) [2], [4]. The studies found that the modular R-PHY architecture gives good throughput-delay performance for short headend-to-remote node distances up to around 100 km.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15)], while the LTE traffic bitrate stayed unchanged at the baseband split rate R B [Eqn. (2)]. The presented delay results represent therefore a conservative assessment of the proposed R-FFT operation in that a consequent transition to R-FFT operation that includes the transition from the conventional CRAN baseband split to the proposed R-FFT split would reduce the LTE traffic portion.…”
Section: Delay Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation