Performance Comparisons of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Manickam, P.; Baskar, T. Guru; Girija, M.; Manimegalai, D.

doi:10.5121/ijwmn.2011.3109

Cited by 57 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The advantage of this protocol is low connection setup delay and the disadvantage is more number of control overheads due to many route reply messages for single route request. AODV performs better in case of packet delivery ratio when it is compared with the other standard routing protocols (Manickam et al, 2011). In this protocol, the attacker may launch several attacks by advertising a false route with some modifications in the routing message and invalidate all the routing updates from other nodes.…”

Section: Security Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secured Routing With Authentication in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Baskar¹

2013

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a collection of wireless mobile nodes that dynamically forms a temporary network without any fixed infrastructure. Each node participates in the ad hoc routing protocol that helps it to discover multi-hop paths through the network to any node. Security challenges have become a primary concern for these networks due to their characteristics such as open medium, dynamic topology, distributed collaboration and other various constraints like battery power and low bandwidth. An Authentication mechanism is certainly needed to prevent the various possible attacks by any malicious node. In this study, we propose an efficient authentication protocol, named CAODV for a MANET with the aid of cryptographic certificates. We implemented this CAODV protocol using the network simulator NS-2 and the simulation results reveal that this mechanism is highly effective even in the presence of large number of malicious nodes. Despite a considerable increase in the routing overhead, it is minimal and outweighed by the increased security services provided by our proposed CAODV protocol for MANET.

show abstract

Section: Security Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secured Routing With Authentication in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Baskar¹

2013

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to evaluate the performance of a routing protocol, various performance or Quantitative metrics [14] are available. Among those metrics, Packet Delivery Ratio, Average End-to-End Delay, Normalized Routing Load and Jitter have been selected in order to evaluate the performance of the routing protocols AODV, DSDV and DSR while varying node density and node mobility.…”

Section: B Simulation Parametersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating the Performance of Routing Protocols Using Quantitative Metrics in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Jagadeepak¹,

RAO²,

Devi³

2014

IJAREEIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Mobile ad hoc network is a collection of wireless mobile nodes which are capable of exchanging information dynamically among themselves without the need of any fixed infrastructure. Inorder to transfer data among these mobile nodes, the process of routing is adopted, which makes use of a routing protocol inorder to select a path along the mobile nodes in the network, through which data packets are sent. Due to dynamic nature of mobile ad hoc networks, links setup between the mobile nodes break most frequently and hence a routing protocol must be efficient enough in handling such situations and should deliver better performance in every aspect. In this paper, the performance of three routing protocols AODV, DSDV and DSR has been analysed using Network Simulator-2. Their performance is evaluated using Quantitative metrics -packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, normalized routing load and jitter by varying node density and node mobility. The simulation results the routing protocol which gives better performance in various scenarios.

show abstract

“…This is the difference between sending time of a packet and receiving time of a packet. This includes all the possible delays caused by buffering during route discovery latency, queuing at the interface queue, retransmission delays at the MAC, and propagation and transfer times [2,4].…”

Section: Average End-to-end Delaymentioning

confidence: 99%

GSM Voice based Performance Analysis of Reactive Routing Protocols of MANETs

Sharma¹,

Kaur²,

Singh³

2013

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A mobile ad hoc network is a multihop wireless network formed by a group of wireless mobile nodes communicating with each other without any centralized infrastructure .This research paper evaluates the performance of AODV and DSR routing protocols in mobile ad hoc network using high quality GSM voice. Average end to end delay, packet loss and traffic sent are the performance metrics used to compare the above said routing protocols using NS-2 simulator. This simulation work shows that AODV is much better as compared to DSR on the basis of discussed parameters.

show abstract

Performance Comparisons of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Cited by 57 publications

References 17 publications

Secured Routing With Authentication in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Secured Routing With Authentication in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Investigating the Performance of Routing Protocols Using Quantitative Metrics in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

GSM Voice based Performance Analysis of Reactive Routing Protocols of MANETs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About