Performance Evaluation and Modeling of Web Services Security

Chen, Jinjun; Zic, John; Tang, Kezhe; Levy, David

doi:10.1109/icws.2007.139

Cited by 32 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the year 2007, Shipping Chen, John Zic, Kezhe Tang, David Levy [4] presented a testing result for monitoring the performance overheads of WS due to WSS. The work includes a client that sends a request to WS for a list of data objects as customer records.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation on Security Implementation and Performance Aspects of MedWS: a Hierarchical SOAP based Web Service

Bora¹,

Bezboruah²

2014

IJDTA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation on Security Implementation and Performance Aspects of MedWS: a Hierarchical SOAP based Web Service

Bora¹,

Bezboruah²

2014

IJDTA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most attractive feature of WS is its interoperability in a heterogeneous environment, and exposing existing applications as a WS increases their reach to different client types. Security measures are not something that can be added in a certain system's architecture, without having thought of them and designed them at the very early stages (Chen et al, 2007). The integration of context into WS composition/transaction ensures that the requirements of and constraints on these WS (either security-or interoperability-oriented) are taken into account.…”

Section: Web Service Security Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Web services for rural areas—Security challenges in development and use

Pimenidis

Georgiadis

2010

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Web Services (WS) are the modern response of traders and online service providers to satisfying the increasing needs and demands of the digital communities. WS formation and operation is based on a software system designed to support interoperable machine-to-machine interaction over a network. Security is of paramount importance to WS and the ability to measure and evaluate the level of security available, is key to establishing and continuing to develop the level of trust based on reputation developed by the provider of the WS. The greatest challenge in offering secure WS is to groups of people where the level of expertise of the user is low and the need for transparency of the service provision quite high, such as the case with services offered primarily to people in rural areas. Providers of such services face many challenges in balancing the requirements for performance, interoperability, and security against the cost of implementing secure systems and running profitable operations through low income generating WS. A review of services offered, of the users and the challenges in building online trust amongst providers and users are discussed for the case of rural areas in the United Kingdom.

show abstract

“…The work that is most closely related to the work presented in this paper is by Chen, Zic, Tang, and Levy [3]; this work compares different security mechanisms in detail and addresses payload size. The contribution of the work described in this paper is the comparison of a larger range of payload types and sizes, analyses of different payload complexities, the secure conversation security mechanism, and mechanism startup costs, as well as the examination of the cost of security from the perspective of message size and resource usage.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One reason for the increase might be payload size. 3 The base payload of the Echo web service is 12 bytes, while that of Employee Details is approximately 112 bytes [26,27]. Considering that the call to the Employee Details service has no arguments while the Echo service has the same input as output, the roundtrip payload size with the Employee Details service is approximately 450% larger than that with the Echo (112 versus 24 bytes).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%