2013
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2012.2219550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation Methodology for Historical Document Image Binarization

Abstract: Document image binarization is of great importance in the document image analysis and recognition pipeline since it affects further stages of the recognition process. The evaluation of a binarization method aids in studying its algorithmic behavior, as well as verifying its effectiveness, by providing qualitative and quantitative indication of its performance. This paper addresses a pixel-based binarization evaluation methodology for historical handwritten/machine-printed document images. In the proposed evalu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the DIBCO dataset [10] had ground-truth images available. This makes the assessment task of real-world images extremely difficult [35]. All care must be taken to guarantee the fairness of the process.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the DIBCO dataset [10] had ground-truth images available. This makes the assessment task of real-world images extremely difficult [35]. All care must be taken to guarantee the fairness of the process.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative results that can be seen in Figure 2 correspond to various methods applied on manuscript image shown in Figure 1a. For quantitative estimation we used the well-known measures pseudo F-measure [21], PSNR [23], NRM [23][24], DRD [26], MPM [25] and geometric accuracy [27]. …”
Section: Performance Analysis With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popular evaluators and indices include the recall, precision, F-Measure, and accuracy [22][23][24] which are considered in this study for the evaluation of RTSSLS.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Automatic Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%