2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab18b2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of a whole-body prototype PET scanner with four-layer DOI detectors

Abstract: Parallax error caused by the detector crystal thickness degrades spatial resolution at the peripheral regions of the field-of-view (FOV) of a scanner. To resolve this issue, depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement is a promising solution to improve the spatial resolution and its uniformity over the entire FOV. Even though DOI detectors have been used in dedicated systems with a small ring diameter such as for the human brain, breast and small animals, the use of DOI detectors for a large bore whole-body PET sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dbPET achieves higher sensitivity and resolution than whole-body PET/CT by i) reduction of respiratory movement of the breast by acquisition in the prone position, and ii) bringing the detector close to the breast. The 4-layer depth-of-interaction detector used in dbPET can maintain sensitivity and resolution at the edges of the transverse eld of view [24,25]. However, if the background mammary gland shows physiological FDG uptake, the contrast of the lesion and background is higher than that of PET/CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dbPET achieves higher sensitivity and resolution than whole-body PET/CT by i) reduction of respiratory movement of the breast by acquisition in the prone position, and ii) bringing the detector close to the breast. The 4-layer depth-of-interaction detector used in dbPET can maintain sensitivity and resolution at the edges of the transverse eld of view [24,25]. However, if the background mammary gland shows physiological FDG uptake, the contrast of the lesion and background is higher than that of PET/CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dbPET achieves higher sensitivity and resolution than whole-body PET/CT by i) reduction of respiratory movement of the breast by acquisition in the prone position, and ii) bringing the detector close to the breast. The 4-layer depth-of-interaction detector used in dbPET can maintain sensitivity and resolution at the edges of the coronal eld of view [28,29]. However, if the background mammary gland shows physiological FDG uptake, the measured dbPET contrast was higher than the measured PET/CT contrast in the same lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dbPET achieves higher geometric sensitivity and spatial resolution than whole-body PET/CT by i) DOI detector and smaller voxel size in the former than in the latter, ii) reduction of respiratory movement of the breast by acquisition in the prone position, and iii) bringing the detector close to the breast. Especially, the 4-layer DOI detector used in dbPET can maintain geometric sensitivity and spatial resolution at the edges of the coronal eld of view [28,29]. The 4-layer DOI detector can detect gamma-ray interaction positions accurately by detecting Compton scattering events, and DOI information can dramatically reduce the voxel size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%