2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4825026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of an automatic MGRF-based lung segmentation approach

Abstract: The segmentation of the lung tissues in chest Computed Tomography (CT) images is an important step for developing any Computer-Aided Diagnostic (CAD) system for lung cancer and other pulmonary diseases. In this paper, we introduce a new framework for validating the accuracy of our developed Joint Markov-Gibbs based lung segmentation approach using 3D realistic synthetic phantoms. These phantoms are created using a 3D Generalized Gauss-Markov Random Field (GGMRF) model of voxel intensities with pairwise interac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four metrics of evaluation were used for evaluating accuracy and robustness of the proposed approach, 32 and comparing it with the ground truth and other approaches. [33][34][35] These metrics are listed below:…”
Section: C Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four metrics of evaluation were used for evaluating accuracy and robustness of the proposed approach, 32 and comparing it with the ground truth and other approaches. [33][34][35] These metrics are listed below:…”
Section: C Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TP represents the number of positively labeled voxels that are correct; the FP is the number of labeled voxels that are classified positively while it is incorrect; the TN is the number of negatively labeled voxels that are correct; and the FN is the number of negatively labeled voxels that are incorrect. The DC value is calculated using all these values as follow [39]:…”
Section: ) Dice Coefficient (Dc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the distance error between the borders of G and S, we used the bidirectional Hausdorff distance (BHD). The HD from the boarder points of G to the boarder points of S is defined as the maximum distance from the border of G to the nearest point on the border of S [39], [40]:…”
Section: ) Bidirectional Hausdorff Distance (Bhd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging [384], the International Symposium on Computational Models for Life Sciences (CMLS) [385], the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) [386], and the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) [387,388].…”
Section: E Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%