2010 7th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc.2010.5421657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of AODV and DYMO Routing Protocols in MANET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Representatives of this branch are OLSR, DSDV [10], [11]. In contrast, the reactive routing protocols, such as AODV, DYMO [12], [13] establish routing tables dynamically when nodes need to find forwarding routes. The proactive routing protocols work well in dynamic, small networks, while the reactive counterparts work better in large, stable networks.…”
Section: A Conventional Manetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representatives of this branch are OLSR, DSDV [10], [11]. In contrast, the reactive routing protocols, such as AODV, DYMO [12], [13] establish routing tables dynamically when nodes need to find forwarding routes. The proactive routing protocols work well in dynamic, small networks, while the reactive counterparts work better in large, stable networks.…”
Section: A Conventional Manetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16], [17] AODV es un algoritmo de encaminamiento por demanda que establece un enlace entre un nodo origen y un nodo destino, unicamente cuando necesita enviar información, y desecha la ruta al terminar el intercambio, generando una nueva conexión en caso de otro envío. AODV trabaja con tres tipos de mensajes enviados via UDP y con encabezados IP, utilizados para el proceso de establecimiento de un enlace [17]:…”
Section: Figuraunclassified
“…We have selected beaconing as a location service because it is able to maintain basic location knowledge about the neighbors of the vehicle without requiring other communication technologies (e.g., 3G networks). In this sense, and according for example to [19], [20], [21], choosing an adequate beacon frequency is a critical issue. A high beacon frequency will saturate the network, while a low beacon frequency offers the protocol a poor perception about the network state, thus reducing performance.…”
Section: Specific Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%