2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12518-021-00360-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of artificial neural networks for natural terrain classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the neurons that receive input information are then transformed using an activation function to ensure nonlinear prediction [26]. This study used the sigmoid function as the activation function [65]. Alternatively, C4.5 does not require any parameter setting due to its inherent simplicity.…”
Section: B Machine Learning Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the neurons that receive input information are then transformed using an activation function to ensure nonlinear prediction [26]. This study used the sigmoid function as the activation function [65]. Alternatively, C4.5 does not require any parameter setting due to its inherent simplicity.…”
Section: B Machine Learning Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there are different varieties of ANN; however, BPNN is the most widely applied variant of ANN in several disciplines; and hence is regarded as the basis for comparison with other ML techniques. Evidence of its efficiency has been documented in diverse geospatial disciplines, such as in geodetic coordinate transformation (Tierra et al., 2008; Ziggah et al., 2016), earth orientation (Schuh et al., 2002), natural terrain classification (Akwensi et al., 2021), surface energy balance (Alemohammad et al., 2017), mass movement (Mandal & Mondal, 2019) and bathymetry inversion (Annan & Wan, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%