2015
DOI: 10.3390/rs8010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of CRW Reef-Scale and Broad-Scale SST-Based Coral Monitoring Products in Fringing Reef Systems of Tobago

Abstract: Satellite-derived sea surface temperature (SST) is used to monitor coral bleaching through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Coral Reef Watch (CRW) Decision Support System (DSS). Since 2000, a broad-scale 50 km SST was used to monitor thermal stress for coral reefs globally. However, some discrepancies were noted when applied to small-scale fringing coral reefs. To address this, CRW created a new DSS, specifically targeted at or near reef scales. Here, we evaluated the new reef-scale (5 km … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Sr/Ca-SST calibration, satellite SSTs were taken from 0.05° × 0.05° NOAA Coral Reef Watch Daily Global 5-km Satellite SST (NOAA CRW SST, Liu et al, 2017;Skirving et al, 2020) centered at 11.375°N 60.525°W for SG1 and 11.275°N 60.475°W for SPEY1. The NOAA CRW SST product was found to be in good agreement with in-situ SST measurements at 3 coral reef sites in Tobago from January to December 2014 (S. S. Mohammed et al, 2016).…”
Section: Instrumental Data Sourcessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For the Sr/Ca-SST calibration, satellite SSTs were taken from 0.05° × 0.05° NOAA Coral Reef Watch Daily Global 5-km Satellite SST (NOAA CRW SST, Liu et al, 2017;Skirving et al, 2020) centered at 11.375°N 60.525°W for SG1 and 11.275°N 60.475°W for SPEY1. The NOAA CRW SST product was found to be in good agreement with in-situ SST measurements at 3 coral reef sites in Tobago from January to December 2014 (S. S. Mohammed et al, 2016).…”
Section: Instrumental Data Sourcessupporting
confidence: 62%