“…Simulation results are compared to competitive methods : (i) SEP [10] with β = 0.3, γ = 0.7, J=2, upd=0, b = e ; (ii) Li TMO [11] with Haar multiscale ; (iii) Fattal [9] using RBW method with α = 0.8, β = 0.3, γ = 0.8, J=2, upd=0 ; (iv) Drago [2] , Reinhard [3] , Ward [4] , Durand [5] , Tumblin [6] , Schlick [7] with the default parameters as given in the HDR Toolbox ; and (v) Duan [8] using β = 0.5. For the proposed method, denoted "Proposed", simulations are conducted with the following parameters : ε = 10 −9 , J = 2, γ = 0.6, ξ = 0.1, σ i deduced from equation (15).…”