2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccw.2009.5208087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, IEEE 802.15.4 attracted many researchers due to its quick implementation and support of low data rate applications with low cost of power consumption. C. Li et al studied the performance of both beacon and non-beacon modes of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol and concluded that the non-beacon mode transcends the beacon mode in terms of throughput and latency but with high cost of power consumption [8]. Similarly, Timmons et al supported the non-beacon mode for low data rate and asymmetric traffic [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, IEEE 802.15.4 attracted many researchers due to its quick implementation and support of low data rate applications with low cost of power consumption. C. Li et al studied the performance of both beacon and non-beacon modes of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol and concluded that the non-beacon mode transcends the beacon mode in terms of throughput and latency but with high cost of power consumption [8]. Similarly, Timmons et al supported the non-beacon mode for low data rate and asymmetric traffic [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…During the CAP period, devices contend for channel access using slotted CSMA-CA. It has been found that IEEE 802.15.4 does not meet all the energy efficiency requirements for WBAN applications [52][53][54]. It is because of these shortcomings that the IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 (Wireless Body Area Networks) began developing a communication standard optimized for low power devices that operate on, in or around the human body (but not limited to humans) to serve a variety of applications including medical, consumer electronics / personal entertainment and others [32].…”
Section: Mac Protocol Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers focused on the use of IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.15.1 [5], however, the latter is not widely adapted due to its complexity and high power consumption. The IEEE 802.15.4, on the other hand, has been extensively studied because of immediate implementation and low-power consumption [6]- [7]. One of the drawbacks of IEEE 802.15.4 is periodic beacon listening, which is not suitable for WBAN due to low duty cycle nodes that may sleep for hours and may not require periodic beaconing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%