2018 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technologies and Applications (Cloudtech) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cloudtech.2018.8713355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of IoT-Fog-Cloud Deployment for Healthcare Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the framework does not support user's mobility, and also does not provide any learning technique to model and predict location related tasks. Kafhali et al 31 emphasize on personalized health monitoring and improving e-healthcare services using IoT-Fog-Cloud paradigm. The potentials of VGI in pervasive healthcare computing applications are presented in Reference 25, where the authors illustrate varied data sources using openstreetmap (OSM) in their case study.…”
Section: Time-critical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the framework does not support user's mobility, and also does not provide any learning technique to model and predict location related tasks. Kafhali et al 31 emphasize on personalized health monitoring and improving e-healthcare services using IoT-Fog-Cloud paradigm. The potentials of VGI in pervasive healthcare computing applications are presented in Reference 25, where the authors illustrate varied data sources using openstreetmap (OSM) in their case study.…”
Section: Time-critical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task exchange between fog nodes and the cloud is only considered if the primary fog node and all its neighbors are congested, e.g., all their offloading thresholds reach the maximum threshold. We assume that cloud servers are much more efficient, and their queueing latency is ignored—i.e., tasks are processed immediately upon arrival at a cloud server [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The maximum offloading threshold is calculated as followed: …”
Section: System Modelling and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the healthcare sector, Alsubaei et al evaluated security in the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) [39]. In addition, Kafhali et al evaluated the response times for accessing medical data stored in a fog-based IoMT implementation framework [40]. They also proposed a queuing model to predict the minimum number of computing resources (both fog and cloud nodes) required to meet the service level agreement (SLA) for response time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%