2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.88.013009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of Maxwell and Cercignani-Lampis gas-wall interaction models in the modeling of thermally driven rarefied gas transport

Abstract: CitationPerformance evaluation of Maxwell and CercignaniLampis gas-wall interaction models in the modeling of thermally driven rarefied gas transport 2013, 88 (1) Physical Review E A systematic study on the performance of two empirical gas-wall interaction models, the Maxwell model and the Cercignani-Lampis (CL) model, in the entire Knudsen range is conducted. The models are evaluated by examining the accuracy of key macroscopic quantities such as temperature, density, and pressure, in three benchmark thermal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the time step in this microscopic simulation is several femtoseconds, which is far smaller than that in the mesoscopic simulation based on the Boltzmann equation (the mean collision time of gas molecules is about a few fraction of one nanosecond). This greatly limits the application of the MD or even hybrid MD-direct simulation Monte Carlo methods (Gu et al 2001;Liang et al 2013;Liang & Ye 2014;Watvisave et al 2015). Some attempts have been made to model the gas-surface interaction also at the mesoscopic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the time step in this microscopic simulation is several femtoseconds, which is far smaller than that in the mesoscopic simulation based on the Boltzmann equation (the mean collision time of gas molecules is about a few fraction of one nanosecond). This greatly limits the application of the MD or even hybrid MD-direct simulation Monte Carlo methods (Gu et al 2001;Liang et al 2013;Liang & Ye 2014;Watvisave et al 2015). Some attempts have been made to model the gas-surface interaction also at the mesoscopic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В теории рассеяния атомных частиц на поверхности широко используются такие явно заданные ядра рассеяния, удовлетворяющие условию взаимности (36), как ядро Максвелла [62], ядро Эпштейна [63] и ядро Черчиньяни-Лэмпис [64]. Эти ядра и их комбинации и обобщения (тоже удовлетворяющие условию взаимности) обсуждаются, например, в недавних статьях [61,[65][66][67][68][69][70] (см. также библиографию к этим статьям).…”
Section: эффективные алгоритмы расчета коэффициентов корреляцийunclassified
“…(2010) used the MD method to calculate the ACs and improved the velocity correlation behaviour for the existing wall models. The hybrid method (Gu, Watkins & Koplik 2010; Liang, Li & Ye 2013) with direct simulation Monte Carlo, which can be used to calculate the bulk flow and MD simulating the scattering when a molecule collides with the wall surface, is popular currently. Yamamoto, Takeuchi & Hyakutake (2006) used the hybrid method to calculate the flows of diatomic molecules of nitrogen in channels with a pure platinum wall and with a platinum wall with pre-adsorbed helium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%