2018
DOI: 10.5267/j.jpm.2018.4.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of project management system based on combination of EFQM and QFD

Abstract: Project management system (PMS) is broadly recognized as the effective management tool for several organizations. European Foundation of Quality Management (EFQM) model provides some advantages for companies to be successful in current competitive environment. This paper is based on the combination of EFQM and Quality function deployment (QFD) in order to evaluate a PMS in an aviation organization. Although, an integration of these models increases the system complexity, the implementation of EFQM-QFD helps us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anticipating the quality of a process, product, or service is one of the major challenges of the contemporary era -determining whether what is being created today will deliver value to users in the future. The main objective of project management is to fulfil the requirements of customers and other stakeholders while meeting the quality standards that satisfy their needs (Digehsara, 2018).…”
Section: Quality Management Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticipating the quality of a process, product, or service is one of the major challenges of the contemporary era -determining whether what is being created today will deliver value to users in the future. The main objective of project management is to fulfil the requirements of customers and other stakeholders while meeting the quality standards that satisfy their needs (Digehsara, 2018).…”
Section: Quality Management Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project performance refers to the degree of accomplishment of project goals. Multiple dimensions are therefore required to evaluate the respective project results (Ahmadi Digehsara et al, 2018). Eisenhardt (1988) argued that monitoring target outcomes is only appropriate for highly programmable tasks.…”
Section: Project Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…shifting the development priorities of meso-level entities from purely financial results to economic, environmental and social consequences of decisions; ▪ alignment of interests of various categories of participants in the management system of the subject of the meso-level of the national economy. As an additional direction, providing an indirect effect of project engineering, one can point to an increase in competitiveness in foreign and domestic markets by increasing the intensity of promotion, increasing advertising budgets and relations with society (Digehsara et al, 2018). The source of funding for these actions will be the savings in production costs as a result of technological development.…”
Section: Calculated By the Authors Based On The Data In The Table 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%