Performance evaluation of TCP variants under different node speeds using OPNET simulator

Sharma, Chitranjan; Tyagi, Bhudev

doi:10.1109/iadcc.2013.6514240

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For loads (50% and 75%) it varies from 93 msec to 122 msec and for fully utilized link (100%) load was 9.7 Sec and then for over utilized link (120%) load reaches 33.2 Sec. Figure 7 shows FTP download response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a request and receiving the response packet.For loads (50% and 75%) it varies from 109 msec to 126 msec and for fully utilized link (100%) load was 47 Sec and then for over utilized link (120%) load reaches 208 Sec. Figure 7 shows FTP download response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a request and receiving the response packet.For loads (50% and 75%) it varies from 109 msec to 126 msec and for fully utilized link (100%) load was 47 Sec and then for over utilized link (120%) load reaches 208 Sec.…”

Section: Fig 5: Http Page Response Timementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 7 shows FTP download response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a request and receiving the response packet.For loads (50% and 75%) it varies from 109 msec to 126 msec and for fully utilized link (100%) load was 47 Sec and then for over utilized link (120%) load reaches 208 Sec. Figure 7 shows FTP download response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a request and receiving the response packet.For loads (50% and 75%) it varies from 109 msec to 126 msec and for fully utilized link (100%) load was 47 Sec and then for over utilized link (120%) load reaches 208 Sec. Figure 8 shows FTP upload response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a file and receiving the response.…”

Section: Fig 5: Http Page Response Timementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 7 shows FTP download response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a request and receiving the response packet.For loads (50% and 75%) it varies from 109 msec to 126 msec and for fully utilized link (100%) load was 47 Sec and then for over utilized link (120%) load reaches 208 Sec. Figure 8 shows FTP upload response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a file and receiving the response. Figure 9 shows Email download response time [9] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending requests for emails and receiving emails from email server in the network.For loads .…”

Section: Fig 5: Http Page Response Timementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Analysis of BGP Multihomed Link Utilization Effect on Internet Services (http, ftp and email)

Moubarak¹,

Elbayoumy²,

Megahed³

et al. 2015

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Different internet services and network performance represented in end-to-end delay and jitter are studied with respect to different link utilization. Internet users will access the internet services through simulated internet network contains number of BGP routers and Multihomed links. Both link utilization effect on the different internet services and the inability of BGP to automatically redistribute the traffic over available Multihomed Links will be highlighted.This paper also introduce a simple network design which is very close to the real internet environment and covers internet users section , ISPs section and enterprise section which represents offered internet services hoping that this model give a hand in the BGP and internet services researches.

show abstract

Section: Fig 5: Http Page Response Timementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fig 5: Http Page Response Timementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 7 shows FTP download response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a request and receiving the response packet.For loads (50% and 75%) it varies from 109 msec to 126 msec and for fully utilized link (100%) load was 47 Sec and then for over utilized link (120%) load reaches 208 Sec. Figure 8 shows FTP upload response time [8] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending a file and receiving the response. Figure 9 shows Email download response time [9] which is defined as the time elapsed between sending requests for emails and receiving emails from email server in the network.For loads .…”

Section: Fig 5: Http Page Response Timementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of BGP Multihomed Link Utilization Effect on Internet Services (http, ftp and email)

Moubarak¹,

Elbayoumy²,

Megahed³

et al. 2015

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research in [4] integrated a discussion on protocols of dynamic source routing (DSR), ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV), TORA and OLSR, regarding scalability and mobility, where OLSR was the most favorite proactive routing protocol, while AODV has been designated as the most effective on-demand protocol for MANET scenarios. The author in [5] also evaluate the performance of different TCP variants such as Tahoe, Reno, New reno and SACK under different node speeds and its effect on Throughput, End to end delay, FTP download response time and FTP upload response time. Also MANET TCP optimization has been investigated in many studies [6,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%