2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2014.6947565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of UAV photogrammetric 3D reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On various scales (from hand specimen to aerial imagery photographed by DSLR cameras) James and Robson (2012) achieved a precision rate exceeding 1:1000. Assuming the flight height of 25 meters as the measurement distance (to model a building using DSLR cameras), Esposito et al (2014) have measured a precision rate of 1:250 on the entire model and achieved better precision than 1:500 locally. Using the lightweight UAV and 5 mm fixed focal length camera in our case, we have achieved a precision rate exceeding 3:100 for the entire model and 1:100 locally (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On various scales (from hand specimen to aerial imagery photographed by DSLR cameras) James and Robson (2012) achieved a precision rate exceeding 1:1000. Assuming the flight height of 25 meters as the measurement distance (to model a building using DSLR cameras), Esposito et al (2014) have measured a precision rate of 1:250 on the entire model and achieved better precision than 1:500 locally. Using the lightweight UAV and 5 mm fixed focal length camera in our case, we have achieved a precision rate exceeding 3:100 for the entire model and 1:100 locally (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a large number of GCPs (11) were used to maximize the accuracy results, which is more than desired by most practitioners, especially for a study area with simple geometry. Espositoa et al [46] evaluated the performance between a sUAS derived point cloud and TLS for 3D reconstruction of a building. In their study, they were able to achieve a global accuracy of 0.10 m and better than 0.05 m for local measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are presented for a mock inspection of a nuclear intermediate level waste (ILW) storage drum chosen for its convenient size, which enabled laboratory based research, and relevance to industrial partners (National Nuclear Laboratory). Visual structural inspection, using UAVs, has seen interest in the literature through its application to the inside and outside of buildings, for example [1,2,3], industrial facilities [4,5,6], landscapes/agriculture and archaeological sites [7,8,9]. The current state-of-the-art for UAV motion control has not progressed far beyond the use of waypoints in conjunction with position tracking, such as Global Positioning System (GPS), to autonomously travel to desired points in a set sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%