2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icrito48877.2020.9197851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Various ANN Architectures Using Proposed Cost Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A and B are the baseline constants for calibration; KSLOC (thousands of Source Lines of Code) represents the size of the software project; SF j stands for five scale factors; EM i stands for seventeen effort multipliers; Cost drivers of the COCOMO2000 Post Architecture model together comprise these scale factors and effort multipliers. In [19], [20] the authors used the Back-Propagation Neural Networks technique through COCOMO dataset & NASA 2 dataset which consist of 60 and 93 projects respectively and the sigmoid function to evaluate software cost. The result showed less MRE value.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A and B are the baseline constants for calibration; KSLOC (thousands of Source Lines of Code) represents the size of the software project; SF j stands for five scale factors; EM i stands for seventeen effort multipliers; Cost drivers of the COCOMO2000 Post Architecture model together comprise these scale factors and effort multipliers. In [19], [20] the authors used the Back-Propagation Neural Networks technique through COCOMO dataset & NASA 2 dataset which consist of 60 and 93 projects respectively and the sigmoid function to evaluate software cost. The result showed less MRE value.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%