2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance information use by politicians and public managers for internal control and external accountability purposes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
50
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Low levels of appreciation and use are found in studies conducted at the central government level in the UK (Johnson and Talbot, 2007); at the state level (Bourdeaux, 2008) and the federal level (Stalebrink and Frisco, 2011) in the USA; in Estonia's central government (Raudla, 2012); in Dutch municipalities (ter Bogt, 2004); and in German and Italian local governments (Grossi et al, 2016). Other studies, however, show opposite, more 'positive' findings, especially Askim (2007) for Norwegian municipalities; Brun and Siegel (2006) for the Swiss central and intermediate governments; Saliterer and Korac (2013) for municipalities in Austria; and Ho (2006) for local governments in the USA's midwest. In addition, some studies show mixed findings, particularly © 2016 CIPFA ter Bogt et al (2015) for intermediate government in the Netherlands.…”
Section: Overview Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low levels of appreciation and use are found in studies conducted at the central government level in the UK (Johnson and Talbot, 2007); at the state level (Bourdeaux, 2008) and the federal level (Stalebrink and Frisco, 2011) in the USA; in Estonia's central government (Raudla, 2012); in Dutch municipalities (ter Bogt, 2004); and in German and Italian local governments (Grossi et al, 2016). Other studies, however, show opposite, more 'positive' findings, especially Askim (2007) for Norwegian municipalities; Brun and Siegel (2006) for the Swiss central and intermediate governments; Saliterer and Korac (2013) for municipalities in Austria; and Ho (2006) for local governments in the USA's midwest. In addition, some studies show mixed findings, particularly © 2016 CIPFA ter Bogt et al (2015) for intermediate government in the Netherlands.…”
Section: Overview Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The first study points to an overall low use, while the second corroborates my earlier conclusion that appreciation measured by a survey can be high, whereas actual use-measured through observations-is low. Other survey studies about performance information use have reported diverging findings (Stalebrink and Frisco, 2011;Saliterer and Korac, 2013).…”
Section: Performance Information Usementioning
confidence: 89%
“…For instance, it has been reported that cost and management accounting technologies facilitate governance and management beyond organizations where policymakers tend to deploy calculative technologies in cost-cutting agendas (Davies 2006;Watkins and Arrignton 2007;Chang 2009;Saliterer and Korac 2013). Cost cutting rather than cost allocation has become part of the everyday language of policymakers who problematize a postcolonial, Keynesian model of welfare policy (Rudra 2002;Ilcan and Phillips 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas accounting researchers tend to focus on accountability and transparency, audit, monitoring, and incentive arrangements for governance toward external stakeholders , much less attention is given to the uses of accounting, performance measures, and managerial rules for corporate governance (for exceptions, see, e.g., Saliterer and Korac, 2013;Tremblay, 2012) and the implications for corporate governance practices and management control (Roussy, 2013).…”
Section: The English Local Authority Corporate Governance Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management control elements are justified by the idea that acting in the public interest involves concerns for the internal business practices of public sector agencies. It articulates concerns frequently voiced in the regulatory and policy making arena that have, thus far, only 4 been sporadically addressed in the academic discussion (Almquist et al, 2013;Saliterer and Korac, 2013). …”
Section: Insert Figure 1 Herementioning
confidence: 99%