2006
DOI: 10.1080/10967490600766987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Management and Public Sector Reform: The Norwegian Hospital Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…. Still, in practice, this relationship is also based on trust to run smoothly (Christensen et al 2006).…”
Section: The Accountability Relation Between the Sai And The Ministriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Still, in practice, this relationship is also based on trust to run smoothly (Christensen et al 2006).…”
Section: The Accountability Relation Between the Sai And The Ministriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the public service PM policy for 2012 from the Public Services Commission (PSC) database was utilised to augment the analysis. To explain the theoretical underpinnings of institutionalising local government PM, the institutional theory was used to explain the conceptual basis for which performance culture is necessary for organizations (Brignall and Modell, 2000;Cavalluzzo and Ittner, 2004;Christensen et al,2006). The results indicate that insufficient resource allocation, low commitment and capacity of chief executives, directors and staff in the implementation of PM contracts are the most serious challenges affecting MMDAs performance indicators.…”
Section: International Journal Of Human Resource Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fair and correct evaluation, in fact, may be strongly prejudiced by inaccuracy as well as low levels of objectivity, which in turn cause skepticism and mistrust of the whole PMS (Brown & Heywood, 2005). Definitely, high trust relations seem to have a positive impact on performance management implementation (Laegreid, Roness, & Rubecksen, 2006;Christensen, Laegreid, & Stigen, 2006). The above mentioned technical aspects are thus aggregated in the second dimension of a PMS's good practice, named "efficiency and transparency".…”
Section: A Model Of Proper Functioning Of a Pms In The Public Sector mentioning
confidence: 99%