2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.06.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance measures for dynamic multi-objective optimisation algorithms

Abstract: When algorithms solve dynamic multi-objective optimisation problems (DMOOPs), performance measures are required to quantify the performance of the algorithm and to compare one algorithm's performance against that of other algorithms. However, for dynamic multi-objective optimisation (DMOO) there are no standard performance measures. This article provides an overview of the performance measures that have been used so far. In addition, issues with performance measures that are currently being used in the DMOO li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the performance the hypervolume indicator has been chosen by following the indications in [31,83]. The hypervolume indicator is selected because it is scaling independent and requires no prior knowledge of the true Pareto-optimal front, this is important when working with real-world problems which have not yet been solved.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to evaluate the performance the hypervolume indicator has been chosen by following the indications in [31,83]. The hypervolume indicator is selected because it is scaling independent and requires no prior knowledge of the true Pareto-optimal front, this is important when working with real-world problems which have not yet been solved.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way the hypervolume indicator is constructed is very appealing in real-world problems as it requires no information regarding the theoretical Pareto-front (which is often unknown in practise.). Furthermore, the hypervolume indicator encompasses within it the information about proximity, diversity, and pertinence, ultimately evaluating the quality of the approximation set, see [31]. Successful examples of incorporating the hypervolume indicator into the optimisation process during the selection stage can be found in [22] and [3], where an adapted version of the hypervolume indicator, named the contributing hypervolume indicator, is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to evaluate the diversity of the proposed algorithm, two diversity indicators are used to compare the spread of the solutions found between NSGA-II-LS, NSGA-II and MODEA [33]. The first diversity performance measures is spacing metric of Schott (S) which measures how evenly the points of approximated Pareto front are distributed in the objective space.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypervolume indicator is selected because it is scaling independent and requires no prior knowledge of the true Pareto front, this is important when working with real-world problems which have not yet been solved. The hypervolume indicator is currently used in the field of multi-objective optimisation as both a performance metric and in the decision making process [21,33].…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%