2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Model of Archimedes Screw Hydro Turbines with Variable Fill Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the geometry of the screw is well-defined, the volume of water entrapped between the planes can be calculated by determining the volume of the region in the bucket beneath the observed fill level. This was done by numerical integration [7]. Once the volume of water in a bucket is known, the volumetric flow rate, an ideal version of the screw without a gap can be determined using the measured rotation speed of the screw.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the geometry of the screw is well-defined, the volume of water entrapped between the planes can be calculated by determining the volume of the region in the bucket beneath the observed fill level. This was done by numerical integration [7]. Once the volume of water in a bucket is known, the volumetric flow rate, an ideal version of the screw without a gap can be determined using the measured rotation speed of the screw.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydropower development alters terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, thereby impacting a multitude of ecological and biophysical processes and feedback mechanisms [43]. Moreover, with the continuous development of hydropower stations, the state support for small-scale hydropower stations is gradually increasing and water wheels and Archimedes screw have become the sustainable and economic technology, since their construction is simpler over turbines, their environmental impact is lower [47][48][49].…”
Section: Factors Analysis Of Sustainable Hydropower Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower performances were found compared to an ASG with fixed trough, suggesting this diminution of performances is due to the friction between fluid and trough. About maximal ASG efficiencies in laboratory, Brada (1999) found results close to 80%; Lubitz, Lyons, and Simmons (2014) and Lashofer et al (2013) had results ranging between 80% and 90%, whereas field efficiencies are on the order of 75% on average. This could be attributable to the fact that rotation speeds are generally not optimal for a given discharge.…”
Section: V10 Released April 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is hard to determine the screw performances for different flow rates at fixed rotational speed or vice-versa. Recently Lubitz et al (2014) proposed a model that takes into account the water fill level and the real screw geometry but friction losses are not included. Thus, by comparing their numerical and experimental results, the authors found a theoretical efficiency much higher than the experimental efficiency.…”
Section: V10 Released April 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%