2017 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ccgrid.2017.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Modelling and Verification of Cloud-Based Auto-Scaling Policies

Abstract: Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evangledis et al [9] addressed performance modeling and formal verification of auto-scaling policies in PaaS and IaaS to provide performance guarantees to reduce SLAs violations, where two cloud services providers Amazon EC2 and Azure have been considered. The authors considered rule-based auto-scaling policies, where upper and/or lower bound on performance metrics such as CPU are expressed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evangledis et al [9] addressed performance modeling and formal verification of auto-scaling policies in PaaS and IaaS to provide performance guarantees to reduce SLAs violations, where two cloud services providers Amazon EC2 and Azure have been considered. The authors considered rule-based auto-scaling policies, where upper and/or lower bound on performance metrics such as CPU are expressed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evangelidis et al propose a probabilistic verification scheme aimed at dynamically evaluating auto-scaling policies of IaaS and PaaS virtual machines in Amazon EC2 and Microsoft Azure [59]. For that, it applies a Markov model implemented in the PRISM model checker [60].…”
Section: Verification Of Cloud Administration Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also observe that this policy will converge to a stable deployment when the ratio of tasks per instance is between T /2 and T , so in the end it will produce a result similar to a tracking policy, though expectedly much more slowly. We therefore propose to evaluate a more aggressive set of rules, P aggr , in which the number of new resources is in proportion both to already running instances and distance to the target (some examples of this approach can also be found in the literature [24,16]). Finally, it should be noted that rules #11 and #12 are present in all the policies to keep the number of instances bounded (in general, lower bounds are chosen to satisfy a minimum desired throughput, while upper bounds are given by cost).…”
Section: Scalability Designmentioning
confidence: 99%