2009
DOI: 10.1626/pps.12.365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a High-Yielding Modern Rice Cultivar Takanari and Several Old and New Cultivars Grown with and without Chemical Fertilizer in a Submerged Paddy Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its ability is mainly determined by leaf area, photosynthetic ability per leaf area and light intercepting characters (Kuroda and Kumura, 1990;Mae, 1997). Modern rice cultivars have already inhered good light intercepting characters (Taylaran et al, 2009). Therefore, leaf area and/or photosynthetic ability per leaf area are the main targets for higher source ability (Ujiie et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its ability is mainly determined by leaf area, photosynthetic ability per leaf area and light intercepting characters (Kuroda and Kumura, 1990;Mae, 1997). Modern rice cultivars have already inhered good light intercepting characters (Taylaran et al, 2009). Therefore, leaf area and/or photosynthetic ability per leaf area are the main targets for higher source ability (Ujiie et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b). The effect of N rates on N2O emission have been most studied, yet little reports about the interaction of rice varieties with the response of N2O emission to N rates, though the response of plant growth to N rates is much differed among varieties with different N absorption capability (Huang et al, 2008;Taylaran et al, 2009). In the present study, the response of N2O emissions to N rates in Y Liangyou-302 was significantly higher than in Ningjing-3 at both Danyang and Jinxian (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The highest DM production of the three treatments was recorded in the Alfisol along with a lower plant N concentration (Table 3) associated with a dilution effect by remobilization of the element to the grain (Zhang et al, 2007;Hirzel et al, 2012). Plant N concentration (Table 3) was not affected by the N rates applied in the field (P > 0.05) unlike the results found by some authors using different N rates (Matsunami et al, 2009;Taylaran et al, 2009;Hirzel and Rodríguez, 2013). Nitrogen uptake in the Alfisol showed the highest levels in the two treatments where N fertilization was applied in the previous season (P < 0.05) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Anaerobic Incubations On Soil N Mineralization Mineralizatiomentioning
confidence: 66%