2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a solar adsorption cooling and desalination system using aluminum fumarate and silica gel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant heat losses from the solar collector and the low heat transfer coefficient from the adsorber plate to the generator were the main causes of the overall low COP for all trials (the maximum average COP was 0.074). Elsheniti et al [12] quantitatively analyzed the use of an aluminum fumarate and silica gel as adsorbents in a solar adsorption cooling and desalination system. The results showed that for normal cooling with inlet chilled water of 15 • C, the COP and gross COP solar for the SG-based system reached 0.6 and 0.4, respectively; they were greater than those for the AF-based system due to the MOF aluminum fumarate's poor heat conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant heat losses from the solar collector and the low heat transfer coefficient from the adsorber plate to the generator were the main causes of the overall low COP for all trials (the maximum average COP was 0.074). Elsheniti et al [12] quantitatively analyzed the use of an aluminum fumarate and silica gel as adsorbents in a solar adsorption cooling and desalination system. The results showed that for normal cooling with inlet chilled water of 15 • C, the COP and gross COP solar for the SG-based system reached 0.6 and 0.4, respectively; they were greater than those for the AF-based system due to the MOF aluminum fumarate's poor heat conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIL-101 has a surface area of 4000 m 2 /g [32] with a pore volume of 1.51 cm 3 /g [33] and can produce an SCE of 89.7 R-ton/ton [34]. Similarly, aluminum fumarate can produce an SCE of 185 W/kg at T reg = 80 • C [35]. Adsorption of other refrigerants, such as CO 2 adsorption on MOFs, is also investigated in the literature [36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low performance of ACD is stemmed from the inefficient heat transfer hence mass transfer within the adsorbent materials due to their low effective thermal agility. As a result, the system's response to the temperature variations during exothermic adsorption and endothermic desorption swing is delayed [6]. Many approaches were investigated to enhance ACD systems to compete with other conventional systems, such as using new composite materials [7][8][9][10][11], adding metallic additives of higher thermal conductivity than the adsorbent materials [12][13][14], developing new granulated adsorbent packing techniques [15], using wire finned heat exchangers [16,17], and adsorbent coating [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%