1998
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1998)124:9(798)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Diaphragm Wall Constructed Using Top-Down Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the publication of Peck [7], lots of researchers have devoted themselves to the analysis of field measurements 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering to reveal the performances of excavations and retaining structures (e.g., O'Rourke, 1981 [8]; Finno et al, 1989 [9]; Ou et al, 1998 [10]; Finno et al, 2007 [11]; and Tan and Wei, 2011 [12]). With the increasing employment of tieback anchored retaining walls, the analysis of the mechanical behavior for an excavation supported by tieback walls is also prevalent in the available literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the publication of Peck [7], lots of researchers have devoted themselves to the analysis of field measurements 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering to reveal the performances of excavations and retaining structures (e.g., O'Rourke, 1981 [8]; Finno et al, 1989 [9]; Ou et al, 1998 [10]; Finno et al, 2007 [11]; and Tan and Wei, 2011 [12]). With the increasing employment of tieback anchored retaining walls, the analysis of the mechanical behavior for an excavation supported by tieback walls is also prevalent in the available literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper adopts a well-documented excavation case history, namely Taipei National Enterprise Center (TNEC), presented by Ou et al (1998). TNEC constructed by top-down construction method had the diaphragm wall with thickness of 0.9 m and depth of 35 m. There were totally 7 excavation stages.…”
Section: Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural bedrock stratum is located at a depth of 46 m. All the soil parameters have been measured by triaxial compression and extension, field vane shear and cone penetration tests with pore-water pressure measurement. In the following numerical calculations, the required soil parameters and state variables are directly taken from the literature [9], [10], [11], correlated with given quantities or estimated.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation 21 Finite-element-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%