2021
DOI: 10.4149/bll_2021_008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of integrated pulmonary index for pulmonary embolism in dyspneic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the mean value of respiratory rate was 28/min, the mean value of blood oxygen saturation was 88% (without oxygen compensation), while the mean value of the heart rate was 88.5/min. 18 for heart rate, no statistical significance was shown in our study in relation to the group of patients who were excluded from the diagnosis of Pe. According to the literature consulted, dyspnea was present in more than 70% of patients in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…the mean value of respiratory rate was 28/min, the mean value of blood oxygen saturation was 88% (without oxygen compensation), while the mean value of the heart rate was 88.5/min. 18 for heart rate, no statistical significance was shown in our study in relation to the group of patients who were excluded from the diagnosis of Pe. According to the literature consulted, dyspnea was present in more than 70% of patients in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…It has been reported that IPI = 1 in sedated patients for PEG placement showed a good sensitivity of 81% for hypoxic events, but its speci city was low and IPI was not superior to isolated EtCO 2 monitoring [4]. In the study reporting that IPI has a high predictive value for pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnoea, the IPI cut-off value was ≤ 2, and the sensitivity and speci city of IPI for this value were 100.0% and 96.0%, respectively [30]. In contrast to the respiratory studies in the literature, one study compared the IPI with other cardiac risk scores in acute coronary syndrome and found that the IPI score had a sensitivity of 83.0% and a speci city of 74.3% in predicting major cardiovascular events [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It has been reported that IPI = 1 in sedated patients for PEG placement showed a good sensitivity of 81% for hypoxic events, but its specificity was low and the IPI was not superior to isolated EtCO 2 monitoring [ 4 , 5 ]. In the study reporting that IPI has a high predictive value for pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnoea, the IPI cut-off value was ≤2, and the sensitivity and specificity of IPI for this value were 100.0% and 96.0%, respectively [ 26 ]. In contrast with the respiratory studies in the literature, one study compared the IPI with other cardiac risk scores in acute coronary syndrome and found that the IPI score had a sensitivity of 83.0% and a specificity of 74.3% in predicting major cardiovascular events [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%