2005
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2005.667.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of New and Standard Cherry Rootstocks in Different Soils and Climatic Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
3
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Carmen sweet cherry trees budded on different rootstocks of Mahaleb cherry of Hungarian selection. It is also confirmed by previous reports (De Salvador et al 2005;Hilsendegen 2005;Bujdoso, Hrotkó 2007;Usenik et al 2008). However, in the experiment of Balmer (2008) trees of cv.…”
Section: Growth and Yieldsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carmen sweet cherry trees budded on different rootstocks of Mahaleb cherry of Hungarian selection. It is also confirmed by previous reports (De Salvador et al 2005;Hilsendegen 2005;Bujdoso, Hrotkó 2007;Usenik et al 2008). However, in the experiment of Balmer (2008) trees of cv.…”
Section: Growth and Yieldsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Summit, and the weakest yielding cultivar was Regina (Table 2). Similar results were found in Europe and Chile (De Salvador et al 2005;Godini et al 2008;Hrotkó et al 2009). …”
Section: Growth and Yieldsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gisela 5 was the most vigour-controlling rootstock reducing trunk cross-sectional area to around 87% of Adara trees in 2005, which is in agreement with a previous study (Whiting et al, 2005). In the Mediterranean area, the poor tree growth induced by Gisela 5 was previously reported (De Salvador et al, 2005). Only Gisela 5 showed greater yield efficiency than Adara associated with the lowest vigour of the first rootstock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It was on Cab 1 1E that the cultivar bore the heaviest fruits, though the weight did not differ significantly from those on P. avium. De Salvador et al (2005) also observed better sized fruits on cultivar 'Lapins' on Cab 11E, but their size did not differ significantly from those raised on F12-1 or Maxma 14. However, Kappel & Lichou (1994) had better sized 'Burlat' fruits from the cultivar grown on F12-1 than on Edabriz and Maxma 14.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Fruit Weightmentioning
confidence: 81%