2019
DOI: 10.5194/wes-4-397-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of non-intrusive uncertainty quantification in the aeroservoelastic simulation of wind turbines

Abstract: Abstract. The present paper characterizes the performance of non-intrusive uncertainty quantification methods for aeroservoelastic wind turbine analysis. Two different methods are considered, namely non-intrusive polynomial chaos expansion and Kriging. Aleatory uncertainties are associated with the wind inflow characteristics and the blade surface state, on account of soiling and/or erosion, and propagated throughout the aeroservoelastic model of a large conceptual offshore wind turbine. Results are compared w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AEP already showed strong convergence at two speeds per wind speed and is largely insensitive to increasing the number of speeds. This was in-line with the finding of Bortolotti et al [56], who noted convergence on predicted fatigue loads and AEP using a small number of turbulent speeds. In conclusion, the minimum requirements of IEC 61400-2 in terms of turbulent speeds were able to guarantee the convergence of power and AEP in the present testcase.…”
Section: Simulation Set-upsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…AEP already showed strong convergence at two speeds per wind speed and is largely insensitive to increasing the number of speeds. This was in-line with the finding of Bortolotti et al [56], who noted convergence on predicted fatigue loads and AEP using a small number of turbulent speeds. In conclusion, the minimum requirements of IEC 61400-2 in terms of turbulent speeds were able to guarantee the convergence of power and AEP in the present testcase.…”
Section: Simulation Set-upsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The interaction between large turbines and the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer is out of the interest of the present study and has been evaluated in detail by Churchfield et al and Nandi et al [31,32]. Moreover, as other authors have pointed out when studying a similar multi-MW wind turbine in an aero-servo-elastic modelling framework [20], six turbulent realizations are enough to guarantee good convergence on the AEP statistics.…”
Section: General Dlc Setupmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although this is not specifically required by the adopted aPC method, which is on the other hand able to operate on any kind of available data, in the present study PDFs were assumed based on an expert's opinion due to the lack of publicly available information regarding the studied parameters. In fact, the PDFs are based on the assumptions of Bortolotti et al [20], who also attempt to deal with input uncertainties in aero-servo-elastic wind turbine models. Two beta functions are used for both LE Erosion Factor ε and TE Damage Factor τ.…”
Section: Probability Density Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bortolotti et al [18] proposed a simple stochastic model to describe the extent of blade span-wise degradation due to leading-edge erosion via a single factor that was assumed to follow a truncated beta distribution. However, the long-term temporal degradation process of the blade's leading-edge was not accounted for.…”
Section: Modelling Leading-edge Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%