2018
DOI: 10.1108/s2040-726220180000020022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Time-based and Non-time-based Clustering in the Identification of River Discharge Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These Streamflow Regime Types are very different from those contain-ing large numbers of members, and any clustering of hydrographs in this way must balance common characteristics against uniqueness. The use of DTW to address these issues in hydrology has been suggested previously (Ehret and Zehe, 2011;Ouyang et al, 2010;Mansor et al, 2018). Overall, the use of dynamic time warping overcomes the timing differences due to latitude and elevation.…”
Section: Streamflow Regime Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These Streamflow Regime Types are very different from those contain-ing large numbers of members, and any clustering of hydrographs in this way must balance common characteristics against uniqueness. The use of DTW to address these issues in hydrology has been suggested previously (Ehret and Zehe, 2011;Ouyang et al, 2010;Mansor et al, 2018). Overall, the use of dynamic time warping overcomes the timing differences due to latitude and elevation.…”
Section: Streamflow Regime Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%