2008 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icuwb.2008.4653290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of UWB systems in the presence of severe multipath and narrowband interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the criteria can be different for different channel models and signaling schemes. 12 Recall that in an MA scenario, each link is identified by a unique frequency offset f r = c/T b . If one employs the criterion ≤ 0.05, one can solve that for a data rate of 10 kbps in an office environment (τ rms ≈ 100 ns), one can choose from a total of 40 available frequency offsets [23, p. 126].…”
Section: Effect Of Delay Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the criteria can be different for different channel models and signaling schemes. 12 Recall that in an MA scenario, each link is identified by a unique frequency offset f r = c/T b . If one employs the criterion ≤ 0.05, one can solve that for a data rate of 10 kbps in an office environment (τ rms ≈ 100 ns), one can choose from a total of 40 available frequency offsets [23, p. 126].…”
Section: Effect Of Delay Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhering to this guideline, different frequency offsets can be used for different communication links to enable MA in the network [11]. In [10], [12], FoTR-UWB technique was studied in a multipath fading environment using standard IEEE UWB channel models. In [10], the bit-errorrate (BER) expression was derived, conditioned on a channel realization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance studies in [15], [18]- [21] have clearly shown that the performance of these receivers get significantly worse in the presence of interference, and have also pointed out that the performance gain offered by a receiver in a multipath environment might disappear in the presence of interference [18]. These results have motivated significant research efforts to develop robust interference cancelation mechanisms to improve the overall performance and coexistence capabilities of non-coherent solutions (see, e.g., [17], [20], [27], [28] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Theoretical studies in [15], [18]- [21] have clearly shown that the performance of these receivers get significantly worse in the presence of interference, and have also pointed out that the performance gain offered by a receiver in a multi-path environment might disappear in the presence of interference [18]. These results have motivated significant research efforts to develop robust interference cancelation mechanisms to improve the overall performance and coexistence capabilities of non-coherent solutions (see, e.g., [17], [20], [27]- [29] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%