2015
DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-1617-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of WVSS-II hygrometers on the FAAM research aircraft

Abstract: Abstract.We compare the performance of five hygrometers fitted to the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurement's (FAAM) BAe 146-301 research aircraft using data from approximately 100 flights executed over the course of 2 years under a wide range of conditions. Bulk comparison of cloud free data show good agreement between chilled mirror hygrometers and a WVSS-II fed from a modified Rosemount inlet, but that a WVSS-II fed from the standard flush inlet appears to over-read compared to the other instruments… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also utilize carbon monoxide (CO) measurements from an AERO AL5002 instrument. 30 Vertical wind information is given by the aircraft turbulence probe, temperature from a loom sensor mounted in a non-deiced Rosemount housing and humidity from a WVSS2 hygrometer (Vance et al , 2015). A downward pointing Leosphere lidar is used to measure cloud top height when the aircraft was flying above the boundary layer, following the method of Kealy et al 4 https://doi.org /10.5194/acp-2019-738 Preprint.…”
Section: Aircraft Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also utilize carbon monoxide (CO) measurements from an AERO AL5002 instrument. 30 Vertical wind information is given by the aircraft turbulence probe, temperature from a loom sensor mounted in a non-deiced Rosemount housing and humidity from a WVSS2 hygrometer (Vance et al , 2015). A downward pointing Leosphere lidar is used to measure cloud top height when the aircraft was flying above the boundary layer, following the method of Kealy et al 4 https://doi.org /10.5194/acp-2019-738 Preprint.…”
Section: Aircraft Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two WVSS-II instruments were mounted on the BAe-146 aircraft, sampling the air through the standard flush inlet and a modified Rosemount inlet, respectively. The water vapor measurements provided by the two instruments can be different (Vance et al, 2015), but for the case presented here the differences are small, of the order of less than 2 % in ambient RH; thus what we used in our analysis is their average. The ambient RH calculation from the WVSS-II water vapor measurements is provided in Appendix C.…”
Section: Ambient Relative Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, HAI is the first airborne instrument that can measure all water phases with the same detection principle, the same evaluation strategy, and with two channels, each spectroscopically and temporally linked by one single laser. When independent devices have been used previously to measure these water products, even with similar TDLAS instruments like in Vance et al (2015), this always led to the discussion on how many of the deviations are caused by atmospheric effects and how many are linked to discrepancies between the participating instruments caused by different characteristics, response times, or nonlinearities of the individual instruments. Indeed, the calibration or even validation of all other open-path hygrometers cited above is based on laboratory measurement or in-flight comparisons with other hygrometers with different properties, making it nearly impossible to justify more than statistical (averaged) statements.…”
Section: Tdlas-based Multi-phase H 2 O Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to most airborne TDLAS instruments, HAI has a relatively low number of reflections and thus relatively short path lengths. Further categorizing distinguishes between wavelength-modulation schemes like single modulation frequency, called direct TDLAS or dTDLAS (Ebert and Wolfrum, 1994), or double modulation schemes like wavelength modulation spectroscopy (WMS) (Podolske and Loewenstein, 1993;Silver, 1992;Silver and Hovde, 1994a;Silver and Zondlo, 2006;Vance et al, 2011;Webster et al, 2004). WMS, often used for very compact sensors, provides on the first glance higher sensitivities by using lock-in technologies to efficiently filter noise.…”
Section: Direct Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%