2017
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2016.2609932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Prediction of Nonbinary Forward Error Correction in Optical Transmission Experiments

Abstract: In this paper, we compare different metrics to predict the error rate of optical systems based on nonbinary forward error correction (FEC). It is shown that an accurate metric to predict the performance of coded modulation based on nonbinary FEC is the mutual information. The accuracy of the prediction is verified in a detailed example with multiple constellation formats and FEC overheads, in both simulations and optical transmission experiments over a recirculating loop. It is shown that the employed FEC code… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The error probability after FEC can often be accurately predicted by considering the MI and GMI. Consider for example the complex AWGN channel, the NB-LDPC codes from [20], and three different 8QAM constellations from [20, for this NB-CM scheme are shown in Fig. 5, where different markers represent different modulation formats and the asymptotic decoding thresholds are shown as dashed vertical lines.…”
Section: Example 3 (Post-fec Performance Prediction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The error probability after FEC can often be accurately predicted by considering the MI and GMI. Consider for example the complex AWGN channel, the NB-LDPC codes from [20], and three different 8QAM constellations from [20, for this NB-CM scheme are shown in Fig. 5, where different markers represent different modulation formats and the asymptotic decoding thresholds are shown as dashed vertical lines.…”
Section: Example 3 (Post-fec Performance Prediction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI vs. SNR for all 2D complex (4D real) constellations in [67]. The capacity of the AWGN channel in (20) is also shown (thick solid line). mated as…”
Section: Corollary 3 (Monte-carlo Approximations)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, hard detection does not imply HDD: Even if hard detection is performed, the channel transition probabilities of the resulting DMC are soft information that can be exploited by a SDD. As explained in [24], the hard-detector channel-aware decoder that implements the decoding rule (2) can be implemented by computing loglikelihood ratios based on the channel transition probabilities of the resulting DMC and feeding them to a conventional soft decision decoder. However, the decoding complexity is then the same as that of SDD.…”
Section: B Coded Modulation With Symbol-wise Hard-detection Channel-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error probability after FEC can be accurately predicted by considering the MI and GMI, for NB-SD-FEC and B-SD-FEC, resp. Consider for example an AWGN channel, the NB-LDPC codes from [5] , and 64QAM). In this case the decoder is binary and the normalized GMI is the quantity that correctly predicts the post-FEC BER for all modulation formats (different markers).…”
Section: Airs As a System Performance Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%