2006
DOI: 10.1080/10714410600873175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performing A/Sexual Teacher: The Cartesian Duality in Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, 'teachers are not supposed to have bodies, let alone sexually functioning ones' (Johnson 2006, 255), and 'professors rarely speak of the place of eros or the erotic in [their] classrooms' (hooks 1994, 191). However, critical research on education and sexuality also suggests that the frisson of eroticised attraction can emerge within the pedagogical relationship as a significant and sometimes positive experience for some teachers and students (Bellas and Gossett 2001;Gallop 1997;Johnson 2006;Jones 1996;McWilliam 1999;Sikes 2006Sikes , 2010. While much of the research that celebrates the embodied erotic pleasures of teaching has been written by feminist educators, it is notable that for male teachers, sexual intimacy with female students continues to be framed as predatory sexual harassment and, as such, is inclined to generate moral panic (Gallop 1995;Jones 1996;Sikes 2008Sikes , 2010.…”
Section: Data Analysis Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, 'teachers are not supposed to have bodies, let alone sexually functioning ones' (Johnson 2006, 255), and 'professors rarely speak of the place of eros or the erotic in [their] classrooms' (hooks 1994, 191). However, critical research on education and sexuality also suggests that the frisson of eroticised attraction can emerge within the pedagogical relationship as a significant and sometimes positive experience for some teachers and students (Bellas and Gossett 2001;Gallop 1997;Johnson 2006;Jones 1996;McWilliam 1999;Sikes 2006Sikes , 2010. While much of the research that celebrates the embodied erotic pleasures of teaching has been written by feminist educators, it is notable that for male teachers, sexual intimacy with female students continues to be framed as predatory sexual harassment and, as such, is inclined to generate moral panic (Gallop 1995;Jones 1996;Sikes 2008Sikes , 2010.…”
Section: Data Analysis Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is "teacher" a kindly mother figure, swaddled in sweaters adorned with apples and crayons and school buses (Atkinson, 2008)? Does the teacher body blandly fade away amidst school walls, unassuming and rather unnoticeable in dull daily outfits (Atkinson, 2008;Johnson, 2006)? Is the teacher body ever so slightly subversively sexy in short skirts and vixen-worthy knee high boots (Johnson, 2006)?…”
Section: The Stereotypical Lookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does the teacher body blandly fade away amidst school walls, unassuming and rather unnoticeable in dull daily outfits (Atkinson, 2008;Johnson, 2006)? Is the teacher body ever so slightly subversively sexy in short skirts and vixen-worthy knee high boots (Johnson, 2006)? We all know that teachers can be soft and nurturing, with a gentle touch and a caring smile (Wall, 2008).…”
Section: The Stereotypical Lookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of studies that explore heterosexuality in TESOL might be explained by the difficult, and often taboo, nature of sexuality in the classroom, where “relationships between male teachers and female students are sexualized as harassment” (Gallop, , p. 81). And yet research on education outside of the TESOL field suggests that the frisson of eroticised attraction that can emerge within the pedagogical relationship is a significant experience for some teachers and students (see, for example, Gallop, ; T. S. Johnson, ; Sikes, ). This article takes up the difficult question of teacher–student heterosexual attraction, the taboo issue that simmers on the edge of Ben's account of Valentine's Day, as a topic that is worthy of investigation within the domain of gender and TESOL.…”
Section: Masculinity and Heterosexuality As Unmarked Categories In Tesolmentioning
confidence: 99%