2013
DOI: 10.1017/s1551929513001077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performing Quantitative Nanomechanical AFM Measurements on Live Cells

Abstract: Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been recognized since the mid-eighties as an excellent technique to image a wide range of samples in their near-natural environment. Although the primary function of AFM is to generate three-dimensional (3D) profiles of the scanned surface, much more information can be delivered via this technique. In 1993, TappingMode was developed, which prevents tip and sample damage due to friction and shear forces and allows qualitative mechanical property mapping through phase imaging. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, BPs have a higher deformation and energy dissipation than MPs (Figures 2B-C, and 2E-F). 21 The large particle deformation may be attributed to the high flexibility of BPs containing lipid bilayer shell, since previous study indicates that the selfassembled lipid bilayer structure could display fluidic and elastic properties. 24 In addition to particle flexibility, we also discuss the mechanical variation of MPs and BPs from an energetic aspect.…”
Section: Afm Characterization Of Flexibility Difference Between Mps Amentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, BPs have a higher deformation and energy dissipation than MPs (Figures 2B-C, and 2E-F). 21 The large particle deformation may be attributed to the high flexibility of BPs containing lipid bilayer shell, since previous study indicates that the selfassembled lipid bilayer structure could display fluidic and elastic properties. 24 In addition to particle flexibility, we also discuss the mechanical variation of MPs and BPs from an energetic aspect.…”
Section: Afm Characterization Of Flexibility Difference Between Mps Amentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To verify this hypothesis, the two kinds of nanoparticles are characterized by atomic force microscope (AFM)-based nanomechanical mapping. [21][22][23] Figures 2A and 2D are the typical topographies of MPs and BPs (more AFM images in Figure S5). Both MPs and BPs show the ball shape, the diameter of which is similar to Cryo-TEM observation.…”
Section: Afm Characterization Of Flexibility Difference Between Mps Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Sr 2+ ions follow the step-pinning model, resulting in a highly irregular growth process 22 as visible in Figure 2D-E. Both ions are, to a certain extent, incorporated in the newly formed crystal 47 .…”
Section: Reference Experiments Differential Growth Of Sa Free Calcitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46][47][48] The maximum indentation force exerted by the tip on the sample during each tap is called 'peak force' and used as a feedback parameter to achieve a topographic image.…”
Section: Peakforce Quantitative Nanomechanical Property Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of widely applied approaches is to use sinusoidal modulation of the relative motion between the tip and the surface such as QNM (Bruker) mode. 52 Compared to conventional FS and FS-based force-volume mapping, the recording speed of this type of advanced FS has reached up to three magnitudes higher than that of the conventional FS with better positional accuracy and force control. [52][53][54] With advanced FS, the exploration of biological events in microsecond range and real molecular resolution became achievable.…”
Section: Advanced Fs-based Force-volume Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%