Performing rurality. But who?

Abstract

Abstract. Reflective inquiries to better understand 'the rural' have tried to embed rural research within the notion of performativity. Performativity assumes that the capacity of language is not simply to communicate but also to consummate action, whereupon citational uses of concepts produce a series of material effects. Of late, this philosophical shift has also implicated geographers as active agents in producing, reproducing and performing rurality. This paper provides a critical evaluation of what this new insistence really means for the production of geographical knowledge. Using framework analysis as a method, the paper scrutinizes several reportedly influential papers on the topic of rural performativity. Our findings reveal that, while indeed reflexive on issues of academic integrity, methodology and ethics, performances of rurality are continuedly placed 'out there' amongst 'rural people' , i.e. in a priori defined and often stereotypically understood contexts, either by way of 'spatial delimitation' or 'activity delimitation' . Effectively, such testimonies provide a truncated state of fidelity, where performance-oriented reflexivity is seconded by contradictory empirics of uneven value and with few commonalities. We conclude that by turning towards performativity as an allegedly more helpful way of obtaining rural coherence, we at the same time overlook our own role in keeping 'rural theory' alive.

Belonging and the Self as Enterprise: Place, Relationships and the Formation of Occupation‐Based Identities

“…Employing a broad definition, May (, p. 372) understands belonging as ‘a sense of ease with oneself and one’s surroundings’, drawing on Miller’s (, p. 218) claim that belonging is ‘the quintessential mode of being human … in which all aspects of the self, as human, are perfectly integrated – a mode of being in which we are as we ought to be: fully ourselves’. Miller’s understanding of belonging aligns with strong links that have been drawn between belonging, place and ontology, and several authors have used the notion of belonging in a similar spirit (see Bell ; Edensor ; Dymitrow and Brauer ). Cuervo and Wyn () have applied this work to regional Australia, drawing on understandings of belonging as performative and relational, and finding that belonging could perhaps be best understood as both a feeling and a practice dependent on the materiality of place.…”

Atavism, Layering and Subversion: Understanding Great Social Challenges of Today Through the Lens of Cultural Contingents

“…In the same vein, tacit popular concepts like "Macedonian identity", "urban development" or "multicultural integration" are thrown around and dragged through the mud to eventually become housebroken and incorporated into policies, replete with their normalising connotations, and without the practitioners even noticing it Nathan, 2015;Dymitrow & Brauer, 2017;Arsovski et al, 2018, Biegańska, 2019, Dymitrow, 2019. Such situations can degenerate into a Milgram-style experiment (Blass, 1999) where authorities are sanctifying such unworkable synthesises.…”

Co-production of urban knowledge: Context approach for effective and efficient governance of cities

“…This study utilizes framework analysis as its principal method. Framework analysis is a tool for analyzing textual material to create an audit trail between the original material and the final conclusions [Dymitrow & Brauer, 2017]. It is used to organize and manage research by means of summarization, resulting in a robust yet flexible matrix output which allows for analyzing data both by case and theme.…”