2019
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1676640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performing through Friday khutbas: re-instrumentalization of religion in the new Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability of homeland-related sermons occurring is highest between 2015 and 2016 compared to 2011, as well as 2019 (Figure 4). Interestingly, this coincides with time trends in nationalist references found in Diyanet sermons in Turkey (Ongur 2020).…”
Section: Quantitative Content Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The probability of homeland-related sermons occurring is highest between 2015 and 2016 compared to 2011, as well as 2019 (Figure 4). Interestingly, this coincides with time trends in nationalist references found in Diyanet sermons in Turkey (Ongur 2020).…”
Section: Quantitative Content Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…One explanation for the deviation between the Fragile State Index and the references to the homeland could be that the index measures a wide range of dimensions, with not all being directly relevant. Yet, the time trends resemble the trends found when analyzing the Diyanet sermons in Turkey (Ongur 2020;Yilmaz and Barry 2020), which suggests that the content of sermons might be influenced by the Diyanet despite being written in Germany. Gorzewski (2015, 274) outlines that the DİTİB has repeatedly used texts written by Diyanet officials in Ankara for German mosques over the past decade, despite the establishment of a local committee in Germany that drafts or adapts Diyanet texts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The literature has shown how like other contexts where populists made use of religion (Yilmaz and Morieson 2021;Yilmaz et al 2021b;Yilmaz et al 2021c), the Erdoganist AKP (Yilmaz and Bashirov 2018), fused its populism and Islam (Yilmaz 2018;Yilmaz 2021a;Yilmaz 2021b;Yilmaz 2021c). Diyanet's Islamism and Islamist populism emerged and intensified in parallel with the AKP's increasing anti-Western 'civilisationist' (Brubaker 2017) rhetoric (Bashirov and Yılmaz 2020) and Islamist populism (Akalin 2016;Öztürk 2016;Öztürk and Sözeri 2018;Yucel 2019;Ongur 2020). This paper contributes to this literature on the Diyanet by showing how it also followed in the footprints of the AKP by constructing and/or disseminating Islamist victimhood narrative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The literature on the Diyanet agrees that the Diyanet has started to be highly politicised and turned into a propaganda machine of the AKP with the appointment of Mehmet Görmez as its director in November 2010 (Öztürk 2016;Yilmaz and Barry 2020;Mutluer 2018;Öztürk and Sözeri 2018;Ongur 2020).…”
Section: Diyanet's Political Instrumentalization By the Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, on the one hand, an increasing number of studies have analysed the growing importance of the Diyanet to the state, the gradual shift in the AKP-controlled Diyanet's discourse, its intensifying media projects, identity politics, militarism, domestic and international use for political purposes and its outreach to diaspora populations (Öztürk 2016;Yilmaz and Barry 2020;Mutluer 2018;Öztürk and Sözeri 2018;Ongur 2020;Yilmaz and Albayrak 2021). On the other hand, some studies have underlined how the motifs of martyrdom and sacrificing one's own life have recently gained a cultic quality in the AKP narratives (Yilmaz and Bashirov 2018, p. 12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%